Skip navigation
Journal article

Prospects and challenges for policy convergence between the EU and China to address imported deforestation

China and the EU have a long history of bilateral cooperation on environmental issues. However, there is a gap in the literature regarding the potential for alignment and synergies of European and Chinese policies and strategies to address imported deforestation. This study helps to fill that gap by building and expanding on the ‘Brussels Effect’ as a framework to analyse the prospects of policy convergence between the EU and China on imported deforestation.

Mairon G. Bastos Lima, Toby Gardner / Published on 3 April 2024

Read the paper  Open access

Citation

Vasconcelos, A.A., Bastos Lima, M.G., Gardner, T.A., & McDermott, C.L. (2024). Prospects and challenges for policy convergence between the EU and China to address imported deforestation. Forest Policy and Economics, 162:103183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2024.103183.

Key messages

  • Key factors facilitating and hindering policy convergence were investigated.

  • Unlikely that China will implement any trade policies based on zero-deforestation.

  • Combined, market forces and cooperative mechanisms can facilitate policy convergence.

  • The EU regulation may lower the barriers for China to adopt measures on deforestation.

  • Need for the Brussels Effect theory to capture the importance of diplomacy.

The EU and China are major importers of ‘forest-risk’ commodities and thus play a pivotal role in shaping the sustainability of those commodities supply chains. The EU recently introduced a regulation mandating due diligence by companies to ensure commodities are not sourced from recently deforested land. However, even if eventually successful in eliminating ‘imported’ deforestation to Europe, the regulation risks creating leakage to China and other markets.

This possibility has prompted stakeholders to call for cooperation and policy alignment between the EU and China to address imported deforestation. This study applies the ‘Brussels Effect’ theory to identify what factors hinder or facilitate such policy convergence. The authors conducted 20 semi-structured interviews with key informants engaged in EU-China dialogues on the topic.

Their findings suggest that, despite political signals from high-level Chinese leadership, it is unlikely that China will adopt trade measures requiring ‘deforestation free’ commodities in the foreseeable future. China’s foreign policy stance of non-interference and concerns about its food security are key obstacles. While this limits the prospects of policy convergence in the short to medium term, a mix of market-based forces and cooperative mechanisms enabled by the EU regulation may lower the barriers and costs for companies to expand compliance with zero deforestation standards to other markets such as China, making some level of ‘de facto’ convergence plausible.

The authors also note the importance of moving beyond a unilateral ‘Brussels Effect’ framing to consider the role of diplomacy, cooperation, and geopolitical conditions that promote, or run counter to, policy convergence.

Read the paper

Open access

SEI authors

Mairon G. Bastos Lima
Mairon G. Bastos Lima

Senior Research Fellow

SEI Headquarters

Toby Gardner
Toby Gardner

Senior Research Fellow

SEI Headquarters

Design and development by Soapbox.