Meet Sukaina, an interdisciplinary senior researcher at SEI Oxford. Sukaina started working at SEI in 2003. She uses qualitative and quantitative methods to understand drivers of behaviour when it comes to climate adaptation. Here she explains more about her work, outlines challenges facing the environmental community, and offers a book recommendation.
What kind of work do you do at SEI?
As a centre, we work on adaptation to climate change. But personally, I do more work on linking the social and environmental aspects of decision-making. My background is in anthropology and computer science, and so I’ve done a bunch of stuff linking qualitative and quantitative research. I’m really interested in how and why people make the decisions they make, and how that links to action on the ground.
Do you use your computer science and anthropology background in your day-to-day work at SEI?
Historically, we did quite a lot of work on social simulation and agent-based modelling here at SEI Oxford. We were developing participatory games — so, interactive games — to try to understand the decision contexts people faced. We wanted to know more about how they were making decisions under climate uncertainty and under other stresses. We’ve done some work, for example, in the Central African Congo basin with forest communities to understand how they make decisions under drought conditions, and how they sustain their livelihoods. To do that, we applied a participatory game that takes into account the drivers of decision-making that are affecting them.
We try to understand how they’ve done things in the past, and then run lots of future scenarios in the game to see what they would do in the future. It’s basically linked to computer science or modelling work because you can run a bunch of what-if scenarios. It’s basically like running an interview and asking them lots of questions but having the computer select which questions you ask and which combination of stresses you are proposing. You can then analyse the responses and look for patterns. While it is quantitative, it is still very participatory. We go back, and then talk to people to find out if the ‘heuristics’ or ‘rules of thumb’ the game comes up with are actually what people do and why they do it. My interest is really in understanding tacit knowledge and the underlying drivers of why people do what they do, which isn’t always obvious.
What influenced you to work with development issues and work at SEI?
I have always been interested in development. I got into anthropology really because I was interested in development. After completing my PhD, I really did not want to stay in academia. I was quite naïve and didn’t know that applied research institutes like SEI even existed! I was trying to figure out what to do after my PhD. I was on a mailing list on social simulation work and saw an advertisement on it for a position at SEI Oxford. The job advertised felt very serendipitous. It was basically my boss advertising for someone to do exactly what I’d done in my PhD, but in Africa, and using the same modelling tools.
What is the SDG that most relates to your work?
The work that we’re doing at the moment in southern Africa looks at the water stress on peri-urban areas. It relates directly to SDG13, to take action to combat climate and its impacts. We’re looking at water security issues and seeing how the cities of Lusaka in Zambia and Windhoek in Namibia are dealing with flooding, drought and disease.
Our work with Future Resilience for African CiTies And Lands (FRACTAL) is looking at cities, so SDG 11 (sustainable cities and communities), but also SDG6 (clean water and sanitation), and SDG3 (good health and well-being).
What do you see as a central challenge facing the environmental community?
We really need to do everything we can to accelerate the learning that we need to do to adapt to climate change. One way we try to do that is through the weADAPT platform. The platform is basically a global knowledge-sharing platform on adaptation where anybody – NGOs, research institutes, or anyone who’s running a project on adaptation – can share the results of that project to support and accelerate learning, facilitate dialogues among the climate change adaptation community, and avoid redundancy. It is important to share and learn from success and failure. There are not many supporting mechanisms in the work that we do to allow people to share their failures, which are experiences that teach us so much. Donors don’t want to hear what has gone wrong, and therefore, that’s not what researchers and practitioners want to share. People seldom want to discuss failure, but this kind of discussion would really help to accelerate learning.
What is a book, show or podcast that has inspired you lately?
The Power of Vulnerability by Brené Brown. I do a lot of personal development work and one of the podcasts I listened to a few years ago inspired me to go down a rabbit hole of Brown’s work.
We wrote a report recently on the learnings and key takeaways from the recently concluded Climate Services Initiative. This brought climate scientists and decision makers in Southern Africa together to co-produce new knowledge. The reason it worked so well, or the cases in which it did work well, is when the climate scientists were really humble in their approach—when they were inquisitive and asking questions and not assuming they had the answers. The “humble science” approach is really what made a lot of it work and speaks to what Brown talks about in her work and the power and “relatedness” to others, that comes with being vulnerable.
Join us to shift global policy and practice towards sustainability. We recruit regularly for our centres in Europe, Asia, Africa and the Americas.
Design and development by Soapbox.