Skip navigation
Perspective

Breakthrough institute fails to flatten climate economics

The case for a carbon tax has not been destroyed – only any notion that only any notion that a carbon tax alone will solve all problems.

Published on 25 May 2012

This article, cross-posted on Grist and CleanTechnica, responds to a recent blogpost by two Breakthrough Institute researchers celebrating the ‘creative destruction’ of climate-economics arguments for a carbon tax as the key tool to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Frank Ackerman, director of the Climate Economics Group in SEI-US, counters that in fact, the case for a carbon tax has not been destroyed – only any notion that a carbon tax alone will solve all problems.

What should be done to reduce carbon emissions? Climate change actually is a crisis that demands massive, immediate response. Putting a price on carbon emissions, funding research on clean energy, and adopting traditional controls on the dirtiest technologies all seem entirely compatible. We’ll need all of the above and more, right away, to stand a chance.

Source: RealClimateEconomics, USA

Written by

Topics and subtopics
Climate : Mitigation
Related centres
SEI US

Design and development by Soapbox.