This Q&A sheds light on the context of the IPCC Synthesis Report (SYR) – its significance, highlights and next steps. SEI’s Francis X. Johnson, a member of the Extended Writing Team, shares insights on the report’s key takeaways.
Francis X. Johnson was a member of the Extended Writing Team (EWT) for the IPCC Synthesis Report (SYR), a small group of authors nominated after the Core Writing Team (CWT) completed the first full draft. The Extended Writing Team was formed to join the overall effort and complement the work of the Core Writing Team.
The SYR aims to synthesize knowledge across the entire IPCC Sixth Assessment report (AR6), which is a cycle spanning over seven years and consisting of three Special reports and three Working Group (WG) reports. Each IPCC assessment cycle includes WG reports and a few Special reports, the topics for which are chosen based on the proposals from members of the IPCC Panel representing different countries and observer organisations.
The SYR synthesizes results from the six underlying IPCC reports, offering the most authoritative yet concise assessment of the state of knowledge on the science of, and response to, climate change. It provides stakeholders (e.g., policymakers, private sector, NGOs, civil society) and the public with a broad overview of climate science and policy. While the information itself isn’t new, emphasis on different issues can change, specific perspectives can be highlighted, and linkages across all six reports can only be analysed and synthesized after their completion at the end of the assessment cycle. Given that these reports comprise thousands of pages and individual references, synthesizing them is considered a crucial final step in the assessment cycle.
The SYR offers the most authoritative yet concise assessment of the state of knowledge on the science of, and response to, climate change.
Francis X. Johnson, SEI Senior Research Fellow
Although it is difficult to easily summarize, a few points stand out:
The three special reports focus on areas that were deemed critical during the AR6, providing an evidence base that complements that of the three Working Group reports by addressing certain issues in greater detail. The 1.5°C report evaluated the differences between pathways to maintaining global average temperature increase below 1.5°C and those below 2°C, in the broader context of sustainable development and the global response to climate change. The Land report examined land use and climate linkages, emphasizing areas facing land degradation, desertification, and the impacts on agriculture and food production, while exploring land-based mitigation and carbon removal. The Oceans and Cryosphere report explored how these systems are affected by climate change, including sea level rise and glacier melt, and the possible responses.
The SYR offers scientific and science-to-policy guidance for COP28 work programmes and agenda items. It complements the Global Stocktake, which evaluates progress in meeting the Paris Agreement goals. Since the SYR is being launched nearly nine months before COP28, it has a good opportunity to influence the COP, as agenda items are usually established at the UNFCCC Bonn Intersessional meeting in June.
The SYR identifies key issues and priorities at the global level, so its scope for addressing specific national or regional issues is limited. It does not provide guidance for specific countries, and unlike the WG II report, it does not have separate sections by world region. However, in cases where there are significant regional differences, the report highlights them.
Media advisory / SEI's Francis X. Johnson contributed his expertise to the new climate Synthesis Report launched today by the IPCC.
Design and development by Soapbox.